https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59345
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Jan 13 14:57:39 2019
New Revision: 267905
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267905&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-01-13 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/57992
* trans-ar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59345
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59345
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Jan 13 11:06:03 2019
New Revision: 267903
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267903&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-01-13 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/59345
* trans-ar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59345
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Fri Jan 11 06:32:10 2019
New Revision: 267829
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267829&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-01-11 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/59345
* trans-ar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59345
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
So, test case #1 is fixed.
Scrolling down, there are still a few more to be done, so I'll
leave it open.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59345
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59345
--- Comment #3 from Joost VandeVondele
---
I'm pasting here another testcase, since I think it is related.
This works as it should (i.e. no pack/unpack), an allocatable as function
result:
> cat tt.f90
SUBROUTINE S1(A)
INTERFACE
FUNCTION
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59345
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2013-12-22 00:00:00 |2014-12-6
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59345
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
