[Bug fortran/59093] Segfault in gfc_trans_pointer_assignment

2018-03-07 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59093 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug fortran/59093] Segfault in gfc_trans_pointer_assignment

2018-03-07 Thread matthew.thompson at nasa dot gov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59093 --- Comment #14 from Matt Thompson --- Query: What version of GCC will fix this? It was reported fixed last year, but GCC 7.3.0 still ICEs out.

[Bug fortran/59093] Segfault in gfc_trans_pointer_assignment

2017-06-11 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59093 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/59093] Segfault in gfc_trans_pointer_assignment

2017-05-17 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59093 Vittorio Zecca changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zeccav at gmail dot com --- Comment #12

[Bug fortran/59093] Segfault in gfc_trans_pointer_assignment

2016-06-08 Thread matthew.thompson at nasa dot gov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59093 --- Comment #11 from Matt Thompson --- Bug still present in GCC 6.1.0: (907) $ gfortran --version GNU Fortran (GCC) 6.1.0 Copyright (C) 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is

[Bug fortran/59093] Segfault in gfc_trans_pointer_assignment

2016-04-06 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59093 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||damian at sourceryinstitute dot or

[Bug fortran/59093] Segfault in gfc_trans_pointer_assignment

2015-05-21 Thread matthew.thompson at nasa dot gov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59093 Matt Thompson changed: What|Removed |Added Version|4.9.1 |5.1.0 --- Comment #9 from Matt Thompson

[Bug fortran/59093] Segfault in gfc_trans_pointer_assignment

2015-01-25 Thread anlauf at gmx dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59093 Harald Anlauf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gmx dot de --- Comment #8 from

[Bug fortran/59093] Segfault in gfc_trans_pointer_assignment

2014-08-14 Thread matthew.thompson at nasa dot gov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59093 Matt Thompson changed: What|Removed |Added Version|4.8.1 |4.9.1 --- Comment #7 from Matt Thompson

[Bug fortran/59093] Segfault in gfc_trans_pointer_assignment

2014-06-11 Thread matthew.thompson at nasa dot gov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59093 --- Comment #6 from Matt Thompson --- Has there been any work/success on this bug? It's still affecting our ability to compile this code with gfortran.

[Bug fortran/59093] Segfault in gfc_trans_pointer_assignment

2014-03-26 Thread matthew.thompson at nasa dot gov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59093 --- Comment #5 from Matt Thompson --- An additional thought. You have a reduced test case which dies in Comment #3 (which fails for gfortran 4.9). However, you can make something similar which succeeds: program main implicit none type :: MA

[Bug fortran/59093] Segfault in gfc_trans_pointer_assignment

2014-03-19 Thread matthew.thompson at nasa dot gov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59093 --- Comment #4 from Matt Thompson --- Any progress on this bug in the latest versions of the compiler?