http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58916
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58916
--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Wed Dec 11 14:02:44 2013
New Revision: 205894
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205894&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-12-11 Janus Weil
PR fortran/58916
* resolve.c (co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58916
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Fuka ---
Sorry, didn't remember that.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58916
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 58917 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58916
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #1)
> Here is a variant without classes:
>
> real, allocatable :: a
> real b(1)
> allocate(a, source=b)
> end
I just noticed that this case has been filed as PR 5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58916
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #3)
> This updated patch rejects both test cases
... and regtests cleanly (except for the current failure of PR 59428).
