[Bug fortran/58857] [OOP] CLASS wrongly rejected in BLOCK DATA

2025-01-25 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58857 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSI

[Bug fortran/58857] [OOP] CLASS wrongly rejected in BLOCK DATA

2025-01-25 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58857 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8fd2158acac181a308126ad7b798b478eb3b7087 commit r15-7212-g8fd2158acac181a308126ad7b798b478eb3b7087 Author: Harald Anlauf Date: Sa

[Bug fortran/58857] [OOP] CLASS wrongly rejected in BLOCK DATA

2025-01-25 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58857 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|u

[Bug fortran/58857] [OOP] CLASS wrongly rejected in BLOCK DATA

2025-01-25 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58857 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #60266|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug fortran/58857] [OOP] CLASS wrongly rejected in BLOCK DATA

2025-01-24 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58857 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/58857] [OOP] CLASS wrongly rejected in BLOCK DATA

2025-01-24 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58857 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/58857] [OOP] CLASS wrongly rejected in BLOCK DATA

2013-12-14 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58857 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/58857] [OOP] CLASS wrongly rejected in BLOCK DATA

2013-10-29 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58857 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus --- I tried compiling the code of comment 0 with different compilers. Result: * Cray ftn simply compiled it. * Portland Group's pgf90 rejected it with the bogus: PGF90-S-0155-Polymorphic variable must be a point