https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57711
--- Comment #9 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #8)
> (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #6)
> > Patch for PR40276 and this PR:
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-06/msg00132.html (approved).
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57711
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-stdcheck
--- Comment #8 from Thoma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57711
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57711
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus ---
Patch for PR40276 and this PR:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-06/msg00132.html (approved).
It fails for the test case http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-07/msg00017.html
(-> PR39290 and PR20896). In that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57711
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Dmitry Kabanov from comment #4)
> Regarding the bug in JAC/DUMMY_JAC: I think for one-dimensional arrays there
> is no difference between ASSUMED-SIZE and ASSUMED-SHAPE.
That's wrong:
- Assumed-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57711
--- Comment #4 from Dmitry Kabanov ---
@Dominique:
a) I get the following error:
make all
gfortran -c vode.f
gfortran -c fcns.f90
gfortran -c main.f90
main.f90:8.75:
call vode(istate, lambda_fcn, dummy_jac, lambda, x_tmp, x_end, tol, pm)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57711
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid, diagnostic
S
