https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57262
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Not convinced, but let me move it to NEW.
More than three years later I am still not convince that such nano-optimisation
has any interest. What about closing this PR as WONTFIX.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57262
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57262
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
Created attachment 30105
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30105&action=edit
Draft patch (trans-intrinsic.c only, ubound/lbound only, untested)
PATCH: Draft patch for the second case (i.e. a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57262
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
What is expected if i (jjj) /= 1?
