[Bug fortran/57042] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE/Segfault with -fdump-parse-tree

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57042 --- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Sat Jan 11 22:47:25 2014 New Revision: 206560 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206560&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-01-11 Janus Weil Backport from mainline 2013-12-2

[Bug fortran/57042] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE/Segfault with -fdump-parse-tree

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57042 --- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Sat Jan 11 20:34:48 2014 New Revision: 206556 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206556&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-01-11 Janus Weil Backport from mainline 2013-12-2

[Bug fortran/57042] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE/Segfault with -fdump-parse-tree

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57042 --- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #4) > Other functions returning characters have a bogus > typespec: Huh. Problem with implicit typing? Adding 'implicit none' yields an unknown type for 'adj

[Bug fortran/57042] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE/Segfault with -fdump-parse-tree

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57042 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|una

[Bug fortran/57042] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE/Segfault with -fdump-parse-tree

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57042 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #5) > I was not aware that this is a regression. The ICE on comment 0 happens only with 4.6 and later, due the fact that the ICE occurs on the COMPILER_OPTIONS symbol

[Bug fortran/57042] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE/Segfault with -fdump-parse-tree

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57042 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org