http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56849
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56849
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2013-04-08
20:13:47 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sun Apr 7 08:41:17 2013
New Revision: 197550
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197550&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-04-07 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56849
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2013-04-05
20:38:05 UTC ---
Seems as if someone missed the purpose of ORDER=, which doesn't affect the
shape:
print *, shape (reshape([1,2,3,4,5,6], [2,3], order=[1,2]))
print *, shape (reshape([1,2,3,4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56849
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56849
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56849
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres 2013-04-05
20:02:31 UTC ---
On x86_64-apple-darwin10, I get
pr56849.f90:3:
x(:,1:1) = reshape(y(::2), [1,2])
1
Error: Different shape for array assignment at (1) on dimension 1 (2 and 1)
f
