subject:"\[Bug fortran\/55916\] Alignment issues with real\(16\) on i686"

[Bug fortran/55916] Alignment issues with real(16) on i686

2015-12-06 Thread jouko.orava at iki dot fi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55916 --- Comment #13 from Jouko Orava --- (In reply to Joost VandeVondele from comment #12) > I'm wondering if you had a working patch at some point. Not a comprehensive one, no. I recall modifying libgfortran/runtime/memory.c was not sufficient. I

[Bug fortran/55916] Alignment issues with real(16) on i686

2015-12-05 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55916 Joost VandeVondele changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz

[Bug fortran/55916] Alignment issues with real(16) on i686

2014-02-08 Thread jouko.orava at iki dot fi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55916 --- Comment #11 from Jouko Orava --- Just in case there are users who encounter this bug report, here is the single-file workaround. Save the following as nosegfault.c, and follow the instructions in the comments. It can be compiled into a shared

[Bug fortran/55916] Alignment issues with real(16) on i686

2014-02-08 Thread jouko.orava at iki dot fi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55916 --- Comment #10 from Jouko Orava --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #9) > I can do the testing on darwin (intel d10 and d13, ppc d9). That would be very much appreciated. I've put a tarball and some background info on my web page

[Bug fortran/55916] Alignment issues with real(16) on i686

2014-02-08 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55916 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > My hardware selection is very limited, but if someone wishes to test the > possibilities on other hardware, I'd be happy to clean up my benchmarking > code. I can do the testing on darwin (intel d10

[Bug fortran/55916] Alignment issues with real(16) on i686

2014-02-08 Thread jouko.orava at iki dot fi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55916 Jouko Orava changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jouko.orava at iki dot fi --- Comment #8 fr

[Bug fortran/55916] Alignment issues with real(16) on i686

2014-02-07 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55916 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thatcadguy at gmail dot com --- Comment #7

[Bug fortran/55916] Alignment issues with real(16) on i686

2013-01-09 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55916 --- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2013-01-09 20:57:13 UTC --- On Wed, 9 Jan 2013, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55916 > > --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski 2013-01-09

[Bug fortran/55916] Alignment issues with real(16) on i686

2013-01-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55916 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski 2013-01-09 16:09:25 UTC --- > As __float128 is outside of the scope of C/C++, this is not a bug on the C > library side. It might be outside the scope of C/C++ but doesn't C99 allow some implementation

[Bug fortran/55916] Alignment issues with real(16) on i686

2013-01-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55916 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener 2013-01-09 13:38:12 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > (In reply to comment #1) > > > posix_memalign unfortunately has a weird enough interface that we can't > > > easily ex

[Bug fortran/55916] Alignment issues with real(16) on i686

2013-01-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55916 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener 2013-01-09 13:30:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > posix_memalign unfortunately has a weird enough interface that we can't > > easily extract alignment for the pointer.