[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

2017-09-10 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #26 from Paul Thomas --- Fixed on trunk. I am sorry that it has taken so long. Thanks for the report. Paul

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

2017-09-10 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #25 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Sep 10 17:02:53 2017 New Revision: 251949 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251949&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-09-10 Paul Thomas PR fortran/34640 PR fortran/4073

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

2013-01-07 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

2013-01-07 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #23 from Tobias Burnus 2013-01-07 18:30:25 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Mon Jan 7 18:30:11 2013 New Revision: 194990 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194990 Log: 2013-01-07 Tobias Burnus

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

2013-01-07 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #22 from Tobias Burnus 2013-01-07 08:36:24 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Mon Jan 7 08:36:16 2013 New Revision: 194962 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194962 Log: 2012-01-07 Tobias Burnus

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

2013-01-06 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #21 from Tobias Burnus 2013-01-06 15:33:24 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > To the last test case of comment 0: I mentioned this example in the array-descriptor/subpointer PR 40737 to make sure it is not forgotten. (I

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

2013-01-05 Thread anlauf at gmx dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #20 from Harald Anlauf 2013-01-05 13:12:30 UTC --- (In reply to comment #19) Sorry for the invalid code: > select type (this) should have been: select type (x => this% x) which compiles (no ICE). ;-)

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

2013-01-04 Thread anlauf at gmx dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #19 from Harald Anlauf 2013-01-04 23:57:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #17) > Author: burnus > Date: Fri Jan 4 08:57:58 2013 > New Revision: 194885 Great! I extended the example from comment #10 to find: module gfcbug

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

2013-01-04 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #18 from Tobias Burnus 2013-01-04 08:59:53 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Fri Jan 4 08:59:47 2013 New Revision: 194886 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194886 Log: 2014-01-04 Tobias Burnus

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

2013-01-04 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #17 from Tobias Burnus 2013-01-04 08:58:05 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Fri Jan 4 08:57:58 2013 New Revision: 194885 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194885 Log: 2013-01-03 Tobias Burnus

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

2013-01-03 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #16 from Tobias Burnus 2013-01-03 23:51:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) The patch has been submitted: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-01/msg00017.html (In reply to comment #13) > C512 (R506) The function-referen

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

2013-01-03 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #15 from Tobias Burnus 2013-01-03 16:54:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) > type(t), target :: x > class(*), pointer :: ptr2 => x TODO: Check whether that would be also valid if "x" is not SAVE (here it is as "x"

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

2013-01-03 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #14 from Tobias Burnus 2013-01-03 15:44:24 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > + c->ts.type = ts->type = BT_VOID; Ups. The "ts->type =" has to be deleted to fix the failure of comment 13. * * * The followin

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

2013-01-03 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #13 from Tobias Burnus 2013-01-03 13:03:24 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > Proposed patch: Which fails with gfc_typename(): Undefined type for contains subroutine foo type t end type t class(*), allocatable

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

2013-01-03 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #12 from Tobias Burnus 2013-01-03 12:55:23 UTC --- For another failure, see PR 55854. (In reply to comment #10) > I have a simple case where CLASS(*) leads to an ICE. > If it doesn't fit here, please feel free to move it els

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

2013-01-01 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #11 from Tobias Burnus 2013-01-01 14:09:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > I have a simple case where CLASS(*) leads to an ICE. > If it doesn't fit here, please feel free to move it elsewhere. The segfault occurs for com

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

2012-12-29 Thread anlauf at gmx dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 Harald Anlauf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gmx dot de --- Commen

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

2012-12-28 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus 2012-12-28 12:26:15 UTC --- I think all issues have been fixed, except for the sub-pointer issue, i.e. last example of comment 0 - see also comment 6. The following modified version of the last example

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

2012-12-28 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus 2012-12-28 11:22:20 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Fri Dec 28 11:22:14 2012 New Revision: 194743 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194743 Log: 2012-12-28 Tobias Burnus

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

2012-12-22 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus 2012-12-22 17:27:06 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Sat Dec 22 17:27:03 2012 New Revision: 194696 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194696 Log: 2012-12-21 Tobias Burnus

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

2012-12-21 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2012-12-21 22:59:27 UTC --- To the last test case of comment 0: > gives an ICE (segfault) at > vector_comp => field > > 0x62d477 gfc_trans_pointer_assignment(gfc_expr*, gfc_expr*) >

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

2012-12-21 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas 2012-12-21 16:51:41 UTC --- Sorry, I didn't look down the PR - I thought that we were just at the stage of your opening email :-( Paul

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

2012-12-21 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

2012-12-21 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

2012-12-21 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas 2012-12-21 14:29:40 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Fri Dec 21 14:29:34 2012 New Revision: 194663 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194663 Log: 2012-12-21 Paul Thomas PR fortra

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

2012-12-20 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- C