http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54788
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Thanks for the commit.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54788
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54788
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Jul 1 07:53:55 2013
New Revision: 200575
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=200575&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-07-01 Dominique d'Humieres
PR fortran/54788
* arra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54788
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54788
--- Comment #5 from Sylwester Arabas 2012-10-09
18:57:42 UTC ---
Created attachment 28404
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28404
testcase
The bug report got cluttered with non-relevant discussion and code (thanks
aga
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54788
--- Comment #4 from Sylwester Arabas 2012-10-03
10:45:10 UTC ---
Thanks for your replies!
I've managed to get a vector of array pointers employing one more intermediate
derived type. The arrvec_t defined below has also some limited suppo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54788
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2012-10-03
09:14:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> allocate(vec(2))
> allocate(vec(0)%arr(4,4))
I assume you have a C background. In Fortran, by default the lower array bound
is one. Thus, with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54788
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54788
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
