subject:"\[Bug fortran\/54599\] Issues found in gfortran by the Coverity Scan"

[Bug fortran/54599] Issues found in gfortran by the Coverity Scan

2015-08-29 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54599 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/54599] Issues found in gfortran by the Coverity Scan

2014-12-07 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54599 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #10 from Domi

[Bug fortran/54599] Issues found in gfortran by the Coverity Scan

2012-09-22 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54599 --- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus 2012-09-23 06:48:56 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Sun Sep 23 06:48:48 2012 New Revision: 191649 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191649 Log: 2012-09-23 Tobias Burnus

[Bug fortran/54599] Issues found in gfortran by the Coverity Scan

2012-09-22 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54599 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-09-22 21:48:01 UTC --- > > interface.c: gfc_compare_derived_types BUG > >

[Bug fortran/54599] Issues found in gfortran by the Coverity Scan

2012-09-22 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54599 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/54599] Issues found in gfortran by the Coverity Scan

2012-09-22 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54599 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig 2012-09-22 10:32:58 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Sep 22 10:32:51 2012 New Revision: 191640 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191640 Log: 2012-09-22 Thomas König PR fortran/54599

[Bug fortran/54599] Issues found in gfortran by the Coverity Scan

2012-09-20 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54599 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2012-09-20 20:49:27 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Thu Sep 20 20:49:20 2012 New Revision: 191590 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191590 Log: 2012-09-20 Tobias Burnus

[Bug fortran/54599] Issues found in gfortran by the Coverity Scan

2012-09-18 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54599 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2012-09-18 10:10:28 UTC --- And another one: Unreachable code; due to "if(extremum == NULL) {...; continue}", last == NULL is always false: --- a/gcc/fortran/simplify.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/simplify.c @@ -4109,4 +

[Bug fortran/54599] Issues found in gfortran by the Coverity Scan

2012-09-18 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54599 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2012-09-18 09:28:46 UTC --- Dump two patches here. First is about a pointless check ("nl->sym->..." is used all over the place) and the second: If the assert fails, we would use TREE_TYPE(NULL_TREE) ... --- a/gc