http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52724
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52724
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig 2012-09-29
17:38:50 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Sep 29 17:38:46 2012
New Revision: 191854
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191854
Log:
2012-09-29 Thomas König
PR fortran/52724
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52724
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig 2012-09-24
18:07:17 UTC ---
This patch looks promising:
Index: list_read.c
===
--- list_read.c (Revision 191649)
+++ list_read.c (Arbeits
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52724
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig 2012-04-08
08:55:42 UTC ---
Yes, my original test case was bogus.
Slightly reduced test case:
program main
implicit none
integer :: i
character(len=100,kind=4) :: buffer
buffer = 4_"123"
read(buffer,*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52724
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52724
--- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle 2012-03-29
01:05:20 UTC ---
I am curious about what this line is doing:
buffer4 = 4_'123'
buffer4 is a kind=1 variable. have you tried: character(kind=4) buffer4(100) ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52724
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot
|
