http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52059
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52059
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2012-02-01
19:01:54 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Feb 1 19:01:49 2012
New Revision: 183807
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183807
Log:
2012-02-01 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/5205
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52059
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2012-02-01
08:34:32 UTC ---
Submitted patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2012-01/msg00276.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52059
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-31
11:35:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> It works if one undoes the change to trans-expr.c, i.e. [...]
Completely untested patch (neither compiled nor tested in gdb):
Index: trans-expr.c
=
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52059
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aravindvijayan224185 at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52059
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-30
23:33:11 UTC ---
Then plplot (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785433 ) is buggy.
Anyway, it ICEs even with the same bounds.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52059
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52059
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Known to work|
