https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51266
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #6 from Dominique
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51266
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51266
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
*** Bug 51076 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51266
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-15 20:03:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> > (A PR might already exist for this thread.)
>
> Well, there is PR 45290 and PR 50410 comment 9, which are at least related.
And moreover there i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51266
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-15 19:55:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> (A PR might already exist for this thread.)
Well, there is PR 45290 and PR 50410 comment 9, which are at least related.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51266
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2011-11-22
15:44:34 UTC ---
Hmm, I somehow have the feeling that encountered this bug already. See the
thread starting at http://j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/2011-November/004840.html
I think I concur with Malcol
