http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50269
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50269
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus 2013-04-04
07:37:01 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Apr 4 07:22:24 2013
New Revision: 197468
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197468&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-04-04 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50269
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus 2013-04-02
13:28:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > Are we sure? When running the code example given in comment #1, I get a
> > segfault.
> Yes, something seems to be stil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50269
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50269
--- Comment #6 from Rich Townsend 2013-04-01
22:24:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> FIXED on the 4.9 trunk.
Are we sure? When running the code example given in comment #1, I get a
segfault.
Moreover, the following subroutine won
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50269
Rich Townsend changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||townsend at astro dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50269
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50269
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50269
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2011-09-01
21:10:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> This allows the code to compile, but one then gets a segfault
> or the right answer depending on memory layout. I think
> trans-expr.c(conv_isocbinding_proc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50269
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
10 matches
Mail list logo
