[Bug fortran/48700] memory leak with MOVE_ALLOC

2011-11-29 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48700 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/48700] memory leak with MOVE_ALLOC

2011-11-29 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48700 --- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus 2011-11-29 09:57:45 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Tue Nov 29 09:57:40 2011 New Revision: 181801 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181801 Log: 2011-11-29 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/51

[Bug fortran/48700] memory leak with MOVE_ALLOC

2011-05-18 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48700 --- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-18 19:23:01 UTC --- r173874 should fix the issue mentioned in comment #2, but the problem with allocatable arrays in comment #5 is still present.

[Bug fortran/48700] memory leak with MOVE_ALLOC

2011-05-18 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48700 --- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-18 18:51:11 UTC --- Author: janus Date: Wed May 18 18:51:08 2011 New Revision: 173874 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173874 Log: 2011-05-18 Janus Weil PR fortran/4

[Bug fortran/48700] memory leak with MOVE_ALLOC

2011-05-15 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48700 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-15 22:05:00 UTC --- The patch in comment #5 regtests cleanly. But apparently there is also a problem with MOVE_ALLOC and allocatable arrays: program testmv3 type bar integer, allocatabl

[Bug fortran/48700] memory leak with MOVE_ALLOC

2011-05-15 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48700 --- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-15 17:23:11 UTC --- Updated patch: Index: gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c === --- gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c(revision 173770)

[Bug fortran/48700] memory leak with MOVE_ALLOC

2011-05-15 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48700 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-15 13:15:23 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > > We miss to deallocate "sm", before it gets overridden. > > Simple patch which does just that (not regtested): Fails at least on move_alloc_2.f90

[Bug fortran/48700] memory leak with MOVE_ALLOC

2011-05-15 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48700 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|una

[Bug fortran/48700] memory leak with MOVE_ALLOC

2011-05-15 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48700 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[OOP] memory leak with |memory leak with MOVE_ALLOC