[Bug fortran/48352] [4.7 Regression] segfault in fortran/frontend-passes.c

2011-04-01 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48352 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/48352] [4.7 Regression] segfault in fortran/frontend-passes.c

2011-04-01 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48352 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig 2011-04-01 19:31:27 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Fri Apr 1 19:31:23 2011 New Revision: 171849 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171849 Log: 2011-04-01 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/48352

[Bug fortran/48352] [4.7 Regression] segfault in fortran/frontend-passes.c

2011-03-31 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48352 --- Comment #8 from Joost VandeVondele 2011-04-01 06:17:51 UTC --- BTW, from this experience, it would be great to have the frontend optimizations being protected by a switch (-f(no-)frontend-optimizations or similar) which can default to true at

[Bug fortran/48352] [4.7 Regression] segfault in fortran/frontend-passes.c

2011-03-31 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48352 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug fortran/48352] [4.7 Regression] segfault in fortran/frontend-passes.c

2011-03-31 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48352 --- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-03-31 15:01:31 UTC --- I am a little suspicious of this: static int count_arglist; +/* Pointer to an array of gfc_expr ** we operate on, plus its size + and counter. */ + +static gfc_expr ***expr_array

[Bug fortran/48352] [4.7 Regression] segfault in fortran/frontend-passes.c

2011-03-31 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48352 --- Comment #5 from Joost VandeVondele 2011-03-31 13:25:27 UTC --- reduced: INTEGER, DIMENSION(:), POINTER :: a DO I=1,MIN(SIZE(a),SIZE(a)) ENDDO END

[Bug fortran/48352] [4.7 Regression] segfault in fortran/frontend-passes.c

2011-03-31 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48352 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2011-03-31 13:05:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > The regression is caused by r171207. That's http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2011-03/msg00630.html Author: tkoenig Date: Mon Mar 21 07:14:42 2011 New Revision

[Bug fortran/48352] [4.7 Regression] segfault in fortran/frontend-passes.c

2011-03-31 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48352 --- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-03-31 12:54:26 UTC --- The regression is caused by r171207.

[Bug fortran/48352] [4.7 Regression] segfault in fortran/frontend-passes.c

2011-03-30 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48352 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot |

[Bug fortran/48352] [4.7 Regression] segfault in fortran/frontend-passes.c

2011-03-30 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48352 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/48352] [4.7 Regression] segfault in fortran/frontend-passes.c

2011-03-30 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48352 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code CC|