http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47845
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47845
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2011-02-22
13:50:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Thank you for respond this issue, I have modified the definition of vec:). But
> it seems that only the first argument can be set to subclass of vec, the oth
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47845
--- Comment #2 from KePu 2011-02-22 12:54:10 UTC ---
Thank you for respond this issue, I have modified the definition of vec:). But
it seems that only the first argument can be set to subclass of vec, the other
must be strictly set to vec, so the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47845
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
Summ