[Bug fortran/47745] [OOP] Segfault with CLASS(*) and derived type dummy arguments

2016-11-16 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47745 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0

[Bug fortran/47745] [OOP] Segfault with CLASS(*) and derived type dummy arguments

2011-02-16 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47745 --- Comment #11 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-17 02:57:08 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > > I'm learning Fortran 03 and 08 at the moment, so I'm likely to compile > a lot of invalid code. Should I report a bug every time gfortran > ac

[Bug fortran/47745] [OOP] Segfault with CLASS(*) and derived type dummy arguments

2011-02-16 Thread rodneyp at physics dot uq.edu.au
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47745 --- Comment #10 from rodneyp at physics dot uq.edu.au 2011-02-17 00:48:38 UTC --- > Thanks for the report, Rodney! Thanks for working so hard on the compiler. I'm learning Fortran 03 and 08 at the moment, so I'm likely to compile a lot of invali

[Bug fortran/47745] [OOP] Segfault with CLASS(*) and derived type dummy arguments

2011-02-16 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47745 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/47745] [OOP] Segfault with CLASS(*) and derived type dummy arguments

2011-02-16 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47745 --- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-16 20:52:00 UTC --- Author: janus Date: Wed Feb 16 20:51:56 2011 New Revision: 170223 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170223 Log: 2011-02-16 Janus Weil PR fortran/4

[Bug fortran/47745] [OOP] Segfault with CLASS(*) and derived type dummy arguments

2011-02-15 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47745 --- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-15 15:22:10 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > If I did not do any mistake, the patch in comment #5 breaks at least > gfortran.dg/typebound_operator_6.f03: Yes, I'm seeing that too. The followin

[Bug fortran/47745] [OOP] Segfault with CLASS(*) and derived type dummy arguments

2011-02-15 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47745 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-02-15 13:57:47 UTC --- If I did not do any mistake, the patch in comment #5 breaks at least gfortran.dg/typebound_operator_6.f03: /opt/gcc/_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/typebound_operator_6.f03:44

[Bug fortran/47745] [OOP] Segfault with CLASS(*) and derived type dummy arguments

2011-02-15 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47745 --- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-15 11:53:36 UTC --- One can get rid of the ICE via these two hunks: Index: gcc/fortran/interface.c === --- gcc/fortran/interface.

[Bug fortran/47745] [OOP] Segfault with CLASS(*) and derived type dummy arguments

2011-02-15 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47745 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code --- Comment

[Bug fortran/47745] [OOP] Segfault with CLASS(*) and derived type dummy arguments

2011-02-15 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47745 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from ja

[Bug fortran/47745] [OOP] Segfault with CLASS(*) and derived type dummy arguments

2011-02-15 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47745 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/47745] [OOP] Segfault with CLASS(*) and derived type dummy arguments

2011-02-14 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47745 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,