https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47728
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47728
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47728
--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-14 18:12:59 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Mon Feb 14 18:12:55 2011
New Revision: 170144
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170144
Log:
2011-02-14 Janus Weil
PR fortran/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47728
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-14 13:57:55 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> If this survives the testsuite, I will commit it as obvious.
Regtest successful. Will commit shortly.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47728
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47728
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-02-14
10:23:49 UTC ---
> Error: Polymorphic array at (1) not yet supported
I wonder if this should not be a fatal error: if a feature is not implemented,
it is likely to trigger several side effects
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47728
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-14 10:16:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> shouldn't that read:
>
> class(shape), dimension(:), allocatable :: object
> ^
> | no fixed dimen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47728
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-14 10:09:15 UTC ---
Fixing up the CLASS declaration with the ALLOCATABLE attribute yields:
class(shape), dimension(2), allocatable :: object
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47728
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
