http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47523
--- Comment #6 from Diego Novillo 2011-02-02
18:04:31 UTC ---
Author: dnovillo
Date: Wed Feb 2 18:04:21 2011
New Revision: 169697
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169697
Log:
2011-01-30 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/47523
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47523
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47523
--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas 2011-01-30 17:50:07
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Jan 30 17:50:01 2011
New Revision: 169413
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169413
Log:
2011-01-30 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/47523
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47523
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47523
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-28
21:04:40 UTC ---
I think I/O is OK - the issue is probably the same as PR 47519: Mishandling of
intrinsic operations. Though, this case looks a bit different than the other
PR.
void
concat_string (gfc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47523
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Wrong length in I/O |Concatenation with deferred
