http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47352
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47352
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-09 22:59:08 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Wed Feb 9 22:59:02 2011
New Revision: 169987
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169987
Log:
2011-02-09 Janus Weil
PR fortran/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47352
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-09 22:00:21 UTC ---
Here is yet another variant:
Index: gcc/fortran/resolve.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/resolve.c(revision 169985)
+
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47352
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-22 17:48:04 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Index: gcc/fortran/resolve.c
> ===
> --- gcc/fortran/resolve.c (revision 16905
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47352
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-21 23:01:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Simple patch to avoid the ICE:
The patch in comment #3 regtests without problems. However, I'm not sure if
it's the best solution. Here is an alter
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47352
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47352
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-19
15:58:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Found at
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/bbaf59ffd7c372e9#
> (There is another issue in that thread)
The other iss
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47352
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
