http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46978
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46978
--- Comment #11 from Mikael Morin 2010-12-23
13:39:10 UTC ---
Author: mikael
Date: Thu Dec 23 13:39:06 2010
New Revision: 168207
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168207
Log:
2010-12-23 Mikael Morin
PR fortran/46978
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46978
--- Comment #10 from Mikael Morin 2010-12-23
13:35:57 UTC ---
Author: mikael
Date: Thu Dec 23 13:35:53 2010
New Revision: 168206
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168206
Log:
2010-12-23 Mikael Morin
PR fortran/46978
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46978
--- Comment #9 from Martien Hulsen 2010-12-23
09:13:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> This seems to fix it, though I find it somewhat suspicious.
With this change all my test cases run fine again. Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46978
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46978
--- Comment #8 from Mikael Morin 2010-12-20
23:29:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> This seems to be the problem :
> the front-end generates a transposed descriptor for a non-intrinsic function.
> If the function is an intrinsic, the descrip
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46978
--- Comment #7 from Mikael Morin 2010-12-20
23:24:54 UTC ---
This seems to fix it, though I find it somewhat suspicious.
Index: trans-array.c
===
--- trans-array.c(révision 16
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46978
--- Comment #6 from Mikael Morin 2010-12-19
15:47:14 UTC ---
This seems to be the problem :
the front-end generates a transposed descriptor for a non-intrinsic function.
If the function is an intrinsic, the descriptor is filled in the library, a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46978
--- Comment #5 from Mikael Morin 2010-12-17
19:28:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Thus, a good candidate would be the TRANSFER rewriting patch for PR 45648.
>
You mean the TRANSPOSE rewriting patch.
I was hoping not to be the culprit befor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46978
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
Summ
10 matches
Mail list logo