http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46974
--- Comment #11 from Tobias Burnus 2010-12-20
21:44:02 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Dec 20 21:43:58 2010
New Revision: 168095
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168095
Log:
2010-12-20 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46974
--- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus 2010-12-19
11:24:34 UTC ---
*** Bug 34199 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46974
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46974
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus 2010-12-18
20:18:47 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sat Dec 18 20:18:43 2010
New Revision: 168031
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168031
Log:
2010-12-18 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/46
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46974
--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl
2010-12-18 17:10:59 UTC ---
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 10:07:51AM +, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2010-12-18
> 10:07:33 UTC ---
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > + if ((m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46974
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2010-12-18
16:21:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Draft patch:
Which of course does not work ...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46974
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2010-12-18
15:38:18 UTC ---
Draft patch:
--- a/gcc/fortran/target-memory.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/target-memory.c
@@ -445,6 +445,21 @@ gfc_interpret_derived (unsigned char *buffer, size_t
buffer_size, gfc_expr *resu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46974
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46974
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl
2010-12-18 06:45:19 UTC ---
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 12:01:13AM +, sgk at troutmask dot
apl.washington.edu wrote:
>
> Index: simplify.c
> ===
> --
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46974
--- Comment #2 from Steve Kargl
2010-12-18 00:01:03 UTC ---
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 11:15:44PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> Anyone know why this flag is needed?
>
Well, the answer is to let simplify_transfer_[34].f90
in the tests
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46974
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
11 matches
Mail list logo
