https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45290
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45290
--- Comment #18 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Fri Jan 16 12:49:46 2015
New Revision: 219731
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219731&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-16 Janus Weil
PR fortran/45290
* decl.c (ma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45290
--- Comment #17 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #16)
> (In reply to janus from comment #13)
> > (2) We currently get a slightly inappropriate error message for:
>
> This can be fixed with the following patch
...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45290
--- Comment #16 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #13)
> (2) We currently get a slightly inappropriate error message for:
>
> implicit none
> integer, target, save :: t1
> integer, pointer :: p1 => t
> end
This
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45290
Bug 45290 depends on bug 55887, which changed state.
Bug 55887 Summary: [OOP][F08] ICE with CLASS and data-target pointer
association in (default) initialization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55887
What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45290
--- Comment #15 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #13)
> Just two minor leftovers:
>
> (1) Making global variables in a program SAVE_IMPLICIT. (Does it even make a
> difference?)
cf. PR 55207 (and apparently, yes,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45290
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #14
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45290
--- Comment #13 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-08 23:02:56 UTC ---
With r169948, this PR is basically fixed. Just two minor leftovers:
(1) Making global variables in a program SAVE_IMPLICIT. (Does it even make a
difference?)
(2) We curren
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45290
--- Comment #12 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-08 22:51:09 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Tue Feb 8 22:51:04 2011
New Revision: 169948
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169948
Log:
2011-02-08 Janus Weil
PR fortran/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45290
--- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-06 17:42:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > procedure(), pointer :: ptr3 => p2
>
> I now believe that this is invalid (all quotes are F2008):
>
> R505 initia
--- Comment #10 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 13:52 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> procedure(), pointer :: ptr3 => p2
I now believe that this is invalid (all quotes are F2008):
R505 initialization is [...] or => initial-data-target
R443 initial-data-target is desi
--- Comment #9 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 12:37 ---
Another issue besides comment 5 is the following program (from PR 45740), which
gives an ICE.
Actually, I am not quite sure the example is valid as "p2"'s target is not
known at compile time.
module m
procedure(
--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-21 16:21 ---
Comment #6 is fixed by r163445, but comment #5 is still open.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45290
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-21 14:51 ---
Subject: Bug 45290
Author: janus
Date: Sat Aug 21 14:50:57 2010
New Revision: 163445
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=163445
Log:
2010-08-21 Janus Weil
PR fortran/45271
PR for
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-19 11:11 ---
There are also still problems with procedure pointers:
module m
implicit none
procedure(f1), pointer :: pp => f1
contains
integer function f1()
f1 = 42
end function
end module
use m
implicit none
if (pp()/=42
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-18 22:37 ---
r163356 implements pointer initialization.
Leftover To-Do items:
(1) ICE on
module m
implicit none
integer, target, save :: t1
integer, pointer :: p1 => t
integer, pointer :: p2 => p1! ICE
end module m
(
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-18 22:32 ---
Subject: Bug 45290
Author: janus
Date: Wed Aug 18 22:32:22 2010
New Revision: 163356
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=163356
Log:
2010-08-19 Janus Weil
PR fortran/45290
* gfor
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-16 09:37 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > Note: For procedure-pointer components I was not able to find any specific
> > reference to non-NULL default initialization.
>
> It is allowed per:
>
> R440 pro
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-16 09:17 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Note: For procedure-pointer components I was not able to find any specific
> reference to non-NULL default initialization.
It is allowed per:
R440 proc-component-def-stmt is PROCEDURE
--- Comment #1 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-16 07:34 ---
Confirmed.
--
domob at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
20 matches
Mail list logo
