https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44917
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44917
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44917
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-30 13:52:44 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Sat Oct 30 13:52:39 2010
New Revision: 166089
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166089
Log:
2010-10-30 Janus Weil
PR fortran/4
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-12 09:02 ---
Note that the ambiguity is detected if both specifics are already defined in
the base class:
module m
type :: t1
integer :: i = 42
contains
procedure, pass :: make_integer
procedure, pass :: make_inte
--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-12 08:59 ---
Reduced version:
module m
type :: t1
integer :: i = 42
contains
procedure, pass :: make_integer
generic, public :: extract => make_integer
end type t1
type, extends(t1) :: t2
integer :: j = 9
