https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44882
--- Comment #21 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #20)
>
> ...so does this bug still need to be marked as WAITING then?
Update: guess not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44882
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44882
--- Comment #20 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #19)
> On Thu, 5 Oct 2017, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44882
> >
> > --- Comment #18 from Dominique d'Hum
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44882
--- Comment #19 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 5 Oct 2017, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44882
>
> --- Comment #18 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> The code in comment 1 is invalid, t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44882
--- Comment #18 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
The code in comment 1 is invalid, thus the FE can do what it likes. Would it be
enough to close this PR by emitting an error unless the code is compiled with
-std=legacy (as done for pr25071)?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44882
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid, wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44882
--- Comment #16 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
See also pr53086 and pr69368.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44882
--- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 19 Sep 2014, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44882
>
> Dominique d'Humieres changed:
>
>What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44882
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #14 from Domi
--- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-02 10:51
---
The bogus types are not a regression.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
10 matches
Mail list logo