--- Comment #7 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-03 08:04 ---
Fixed.
--
domob at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-03 08:02 ---
Subject: Bug 44602
Author: domob
Date: Fri Sep 3 08:01:51 2010
New Revision: 163798
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=163798
Log:
2010-09-03 Daniel Kraft
PR fortran/44602
* gf
--- Comment #5 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-30 18:27 ---
Experimental patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-08/msg00456.html
It seems to do what it is supposed to (basically) and also runs the full
test-case of PR 44709 comment 0, but there seems to be at least one
--- Comment #4 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-30 12:07 ---
Mine.
--
domob at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-23 08:55 ---
PR 44709 comment 0 contains a small test case, which also applies here.
(That PR fixed "exit loop_label" in BLOCK and try-finally cleanup in BLOCK.)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44602
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-21 07:41 ---
+else if (sym == p->sym)
One should check that this does the right thing for
do
block
exit
end block
end do
as this should leave the DO construct and not only the BLOCK construct (to be
compatib
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-20 20:52 ---
See below for a match.c patch. However, it will fail as the labels are not
available. In principle, one just needs to add:
tree exit_label;
/* The exit label. */
exit_label = gfc_build_label_decl (NULL_TREE);
