--- Comment #5 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-10 18:26 ---
Thus fixed in trunk. Closing.
--
dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-10 18:26 ---
Subject: Bug 44457
Author: dfranke
Date: Thu Jun 10 18:25:56 2010
New Revision: 160567
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=160567
Log:
gcc/fortran/:
2010-06-10 Daniel Franke
PR fortran
--- Comment #3 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-10 17:47 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Thus, I do not see why one should add another version check.
Fine by me.
--
dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-10 07:33 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> This should work (untested). However, ASYNCHRONOUS is F2003. Should one
> introduce standard-specific checks? The whole function seems to be agnostic in
> this respect?!
Well, if you have a
--- Comment #1 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-09 21:19 ---
This should work (untested). However, ASYNCHRONOUS is F2003. Should one
introduce standard-specific checks? The whole function seems to be agnostic in
this respect?!
Index: interface.c
==
