https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44434
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
--- Comment #8 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-13 08:33 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> I just saw that both ifort and crayftn reject the program of comment 1
> (ambiguous interface); I have now filled PR 44434 to track this.
Make that: PR 44926
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugz
--- Comment #7 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-13 08:32 ---
I just saw that both ifort and crayftn reject the program of comment 1
(ambiguous interface); I have now filled PR 44434 to track this.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44434
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-13 06:57 ---
Subject: Bug 44434
Author: janus
Date: Tue Jul 13 06:57:17 2010
New Revision: 162125
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=162125
Log:
2010-07-13 Janus Weil
PR fortran/44434
PR for
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-08 01:19 ---
The backtrace for comment #3 is:
#0 gfc_add_component_ref (e=0x1806e80, name=0x77e7ceb8 "doit") at
/home/jweil/gcc46/trunk/gcc/fortran/class.c:77
#1 0x0052b323 in resolve_typebound_subroutine (code=0x180
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-06 16:16 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> It looks like a duplicate of the unfixed part of pr43945.
It is. One can reduce the test case here to something equivalent to PR 43945
comment #12, which is:
module foo_mod
type foo
con
--- Comment #2 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-06-06 12:18 ---
It looks like a duplicate of the unfixed part of pr43945.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44434
--- Comment #1 from sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it 2010-06-06 12:07 ---
Created an attachment (id=20850)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20850&action=view)
test case
If the CLASS DEFAULT block is switched to use AA%CSGET() instead of A%A%CSGET()
no ICE ensues.
I am n
