http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44352
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44352
--- Comment #16 from Tobias Burnus 2011-07-24
20:05:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> Was this ever backported? Should it still be backported?
No, it has only been fixed for 4.6 (and thus 4.7), but not for 4.5. It is not a
regression but al
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44352
--- Comment #15 from Daniel Franke 2011-07-24
18:51:30 UTC ---
Was this ever backported? Should it still be backported?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44352
--- Comment #14 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com 2011-02-28 06:47:38 UTC ---
Dear Mikael,
It needs the backporting that Thomas suggested. I have been away from
home for a bit and so have not had access to a 4.5 tree. I'll be back
in 04
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44352
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #13
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44352
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.0
--- Comment #12 from Thomas Koenig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44352
Daniel Franke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44352
--- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus 2010-12-07
20:29:25 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Tue Dec 7 20:29:22 2010
New Revision: 167569
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167569
Log:
2010-12-07 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44352
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44352
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas 2010-12-07 05:39:47
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Paul, this involves (for me) some heavy voodoo regarding conversion of
> strings to trees.
>
> Do you have any idea, by any chance?
Thomas,
The odd thing is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44352
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44352
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig 2010-12-03
15:55:42 UTC ---
This works:
character*2 ddname,dname
dname(x)= 'x '
ddname=dname(0.0)
END
We fail to pad the string for this case.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44352
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig 2010-12-03
12:50:24 UTC ---
Reduced test case, not that there was a lot to reduce:
character*2 ddname,dname
dname(x)= 'x'
ddname=dname(0.0)
END
(the test succeeds with character*1)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44352
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig 2010-12-03
12:26:21 UTC ---
The infinite recursion is fixed, the original problem remains.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44352
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig 2010-12-03
12:23:14 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Fri Dec 3 12:23:11 2010
New Revision: 167416
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167416
Log:
2010-12-03 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/44352
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44352
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-01 07:44 ---
CONFIRMED - and no regression. Thanks for the report!
test.f90:4:0: internal compiler error: in string_to_single_character, at
fortran/trans-expr.c:1394
Failing assert:
string_to_single_character (tree len, tree st
17 matches
Mail list logo
