--- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-14 22:49 ---
Fixed on 4.4, 4.5, and trunk.
Thomas, thanks for the bug report.
--
kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-14 22:40 ---
Subject: Bug 44135
Author: kargl
Date: Fri May 14 22:40:01 2010
New Revision: 159419
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=159419
Log:
2010-05-14 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/44135
*
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-14 21:17 ---
Subject: Bug 44135
Author: kargl
Date: Fri May 14 21:17:42 2010
New Revision: 159417
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=159417
Log:
2010-05-14 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/44135
*
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-14 21:02 ---
Subject: Bug 44135
Author: kargl
Date: Fri May 14 21:02:26 2010
New Revision: 159415
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=159415
Log:
2010-05-14 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/44135
*
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-14 18:29 ---
Patch submitted here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-05/msg01080.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44135
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-14 16:34 ---
I have a patch that I'm testing.
--
kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-14 16:23 ---
The problem seems to be triggered by the upper bound value of 0.
If I change it to 1 or -1 in both the main program and the
subroutine, then the warning is not triggered.
--
kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #1 from thomasr at nikhef dot nl 2010-05-14 09:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=20660)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20660&action=view)
Test program that reproduces the bug
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44135
