--- Comment #14 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-13 13:22 ---
Fixed.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #13 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-13 12:39 ---
Subject: Bug 44036
Author: jakub
Date: Thu May 13 12:39:17 2010
New Revision: 159365
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=159365
Log:
PR fortran/44036
* openmp.c (resolve_omp_clauses
--- Comment #12 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-13 12:36 ---
Subject: Bug 44036
Author: jakub
Date: Thu May 13 12:35:52 2010
New Revision: 159363
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=159363
Log:
PR fortran/44036
* openmp.c (resolve_omp_clauses
--- Comment #11 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-13 12:03 ---
Subject: Bug 44036
Author: jakub
Date: Thu May 13 12:02:50 2010
New Revision: 159361
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=159361
Log:
PR fortran/44036
* openmp.c (resolve_omp_clauses
--- Comment #10 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-12 15:27 ---
Created an attachment (id=20649)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20649&action=view)
locus follow-up
Follow-up patch to fix up the locus.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44036
--- Comment #9 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-12 15:25 ---
Created an attachment (id=20648)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20648&action=view)
gcc46-pr44036.patch
Updated patch which implements that. I've split off the locus changes to a
separate follow-u
--- Comment #8 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-12 15:01 ---
Seems dummy procedures are already in F95 and therefore something that OpenMP
3.0 should take into account. So probably for them it would be better to
keep rejecting them in the clause lists and ensure they aren't rej
--- Comment #7 from longb at cray dot com 2010-05-12 14:34 ---
For what it's worth, the Cray compiler produces this message for the test code:
!$OMP shared (a,n,f)
^
ftn-1473 crayftn: ERROR DP, File = test.f90, Line = 13, Column = 19
Object F must be a variable to
--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-12 08:29 ---
Created an attachment (id=20644)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20644&action=view)
gcc46-pr44036.patch
Only very lightly tested patch.
1) allows dummy procedures and procedure pointers, disallows
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-12 08:13 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Using the Intel Fortran Compiler 11.1 (20090630), one gets:
> test.f90(10): error #7655: A variable is required in this OpenMP context.
Ditto for procedure pointers.
> Sun Studio 12 an
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-12 07:52 ---
For information:
Pathscale 3.2.99 and 3.9.99 and Portland pgf90 10.1-0 compile it without
showing an error/warning.
Using the Intel Fortran Compiler 11.1 (20090630), one gets:
test.f90(10): error #6429: This name
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-12 07:00 ---
I'm not convinced that external (without pointer attribute) objects are allowed
in the shared etc. clause lists. The OpenMP 3.0 standard says that a list item
is a variable name or common block name. And the definiti
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-08 01:48 ---
Jakub,
Is the patch in comment #2 correct? If yes, I'll
follow up with a ChangeLog and dejagnu-ify the
submitted code for the testsuite.
--
kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-08 01:44 ---
Created an attachment (id=20600)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20600&action=view)
Allow external entities in a default(none)
This patch allows the code to compile. I, however,
do not know if thi
14 matches
Mail list logo
