--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-09 12:41 ---
Close as WONTFIX.
The int128 changes still do not offer to enter the integer directly (instead of
using 123L with "<<" shifts)
And one issue was fixed as part of
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=1
--- Comment #1 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-09 12:01
---
I don't understand what you mean by that: currently, we have the following
typedefs on platforms which support a 128-bit int type:
typedef __int128_t GFC_INTEGER_16;
typedef __uint128_t GFC_UINTEGER_16;
I do
