--- Comment #8 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2010-01-12 19:04 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Ok to check in?
No, please follow usual procedure for submitting patches and post the patch to
gcc-patches@ first.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42664
--- Comment #7 from harsha dot jagasia at amd dot com 2010-01-12 16:26
---
Ok to check in?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42664
--- Comment #6 from harsha dot jagasia at amd dot com 2010-01-12 16:24
---
Bootstrap and target tests pass with the new patch. Compilation of all
polyhedron benchmarks also passes.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42664
--- Comment #5 from harsha dot jagasia at amd dot com 2010-01-08 21:21
---
Created an attachment (id=19514)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19514&action=view)
Proposed Patch removing 2009-12-2 fixup as suggested by Uros
FWIW, this patch passes the reduced test case
--- Comment #4 from harsha dot jagasia at amd dot com 2010-01-08 20:49
---
Created an attachment (id=19513)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19513&action=view)
expand output file generated by -fdump-rtl-all-all
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42664
--- Comment #3 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2010-01-08 20:47 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> The attached reduced test case derived from ac.f90 in the polyhedron benchmark
> suite gives and ICE when compiled with gfortran 4.5 using -O3 -mfma4. This ICE
> showed up in gcc 4.5 rev 154969 w
--- Comment #2 from harsha dot jagasia at amd dot com 2010-01-08 20:35
---
Created an attachment (id=19512)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19512&action=view)
Proposed Patch
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42664
--- Comment #1 from harsha dot jagasia at amd dot com 2010-01-08 20:34
---
Created an attachment (id=19511)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19511&action=view)
Reduced test case for bug
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42664
