[Bug fortran/42517] -fcheck=recursion does not work with -fopenmp

2010-04-21 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-21 12:25 --- Close as FIXED. If someone feels strong about allowing -fcheck=recursion with -fopenmp, please reopen. (I think as fopenmp implies -frecursive, it does not make much sense.) -- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org chang

[Bug fortran/42517] -fcheck=recursion does not work with -fopenmp

2010-04-19 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #11 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-04-19 11:25 --- Should not this PR closed as fixed? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42517

[Bug fortran/42517] -fcheck=recursion does not work with -fopenmp

2010-01-05 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-05 14:15 --- Subject: Bug 42517 Author: burnus Date: Tue Jan 5 14:15:37 2010 New Revision: 155649 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155649 Log: 2010-01-05 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/42517

[Bug fortran/42517] -fcheck=recursion does not work with -fopenmp

2010-01-04 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #9 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-04 22:36 --- (In reply to comment #8) > The testcase failed at run-time. See PR 42602 > A patch is posted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg00187.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42517

[Bug fortran/42517] -fcheck=recursion does not work with -fopenmp

2010-01-04 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-04 18:41 --- The testcase failed at run-time. See PR 42602 -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug fortran/42517] -fcheck=recursion does not work with -fopenmp

2010-01-04 Thread bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-04 17:54 --- Index: gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c === --- gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c(revision 155625) +++ gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c(working copy)

[Bug fortran/42517] -fcheck=recursion does not work with -fopenmp

2010-01-04 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-04 16:16 --- Mark as fixed as: - The issue of comment 0 is fixed - PR42602 is fixed - As -frecursion is already triggering it (cf. comment 4) and as I do not see a need for a __THREAD version, cf. comment 3. If you see a real need

[Bug fortran/42517] -fcheck=recursion does not work with -fopenmp

2010-01-04 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-04 14:22 --- The testcase gfortran.dg/gomp/recursion1.f90 which was moved to libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/recursion1.f90 now fails randomly, see PR42602. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42517

[Bug fortran/42517] -fcheck=recursion does not work with -fopenmp

2010-01-03 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-04 07:31 --- Subject: Bug 42517 Author: burnus Date: Mon Jan 4 07:30:49 2010 New Revision: 155606 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155606 Log: 2009-01-04 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/41872 *

[Bug fortran/42517] -fcheck=recursion does not work with -fopenmp

2009-12-29 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-29 20:19 --- The commit in comment #2 contains the patch in comment #1 and disables recursion checking if -fopenmp is given. In the long run, the checking should be modified so that it can work with multiple threads. It has been s