--- Comment #13 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-10 15:14 ---
Fixed.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED
--- Comment #12 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-10 15:11 ---
Subject: Bug 42309
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 10 15:11:30 2010
New Revision: 156660
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156660
Log:
PR fortran/42309
* trans-expr.c (gfc_conv_subref
--- Comment #11 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-10 15:11 ---
Subject: Bug 42309
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 10 15:10:53 2010
New Revision: 156659
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156659
Log:
PR fortran/42309
* trans-expr.c (gfc_conv_subref
--- Comment #10 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-10 13:54 ---
Patch for 4.4 and the 4.5-trunk by Jakub:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-02/msg00063.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42309
--- Comment #9 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-08 14:47 ---
Regarding 4.4: It fails here (x86-64) for any option for:
IF (ANY (T1%I .NE. [999, 2, 999, 4])) CALL ABORT
as the result is:[1, 999, 3, 999]. (The other check succeeds.)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-02-07 00:31 ---
On Linux/x86-64, gcc 4.4 at revision 156554 gave
Executing on host:
/export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test/bld/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran
-B/export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test/bld/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../
/expo
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.4.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42309
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-06 19:45 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.4.
Many thanks for the report!
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-06 19:44 ---
Subject: Bug 42309
Author: pault
Date: Sat Feb 6 19:44:41 2010
New Revision: 156554
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156554
Log:
2010-02-06 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/42309
* tra
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-05 05:28 ---
Subject: Bug 42309
Author: pault
Date: Fri Feb 5 05:28:37 2010
New Revision: 156512
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156512
Log:
2010-02-05 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/42309
* tra
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-03 16:21 ---
Paul's patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-02/msg00019.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42309
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-02 05:17 ---
I am not at all happy with designating this bug a regression. This worked with
4.1 and 4.2 because the stride measure for the derived type was the same as an
integer; add more components and see what happens
I am
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-31 20:40 ---
I think that I know how to fix this one, so am assigning myself. I would
regard this as a "serious" bug.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-06 15:00
---
using Q(0) puts the 999 in the first position. We have an off by one error
here.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
14 matches
Mail list logo
