[Bug fortran/42118] Slow forall

2019-11-24 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42118 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/42118] Slow forall

2019-10-07 Thread guez at lmd dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42118 --- Comment #10 from Lionel GUEZ --- (In reply to kargl from comment #9) > Fortran 2018 has declared FORALL to be an obsolescent feature. > I doubt that anyone will ever try to improve the performance > of FORALL, because the next standard is lik

[Bug fortran/42118] Slow forall

2019-10-04 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42118 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug fortran/42118] Slow forall

2019-02-02 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42118 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/42118] Slow forall

2013-10-08 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42118 --- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #7) > By the way, the Fortran committee is considering to deprecate FORALL in the > next standard (Fortran 2015) because it considers FORALL superior in nearly > all asp

[Bug fortran/42118] Slow forall

2013-10-08 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42118 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug fortran/42118] Slow forall

2013-10-08 Thread ebay.20.tedlap at spamgourmet dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42118 Lionel GUEZ changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebay.20.tedlap@spamgourmet.

[Bug fortran/42118] Slow forall

2012-03-01 Thread anlauf at gmx dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42118 Harald Anlauf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gmx dot de --- Comment #5 from

[Bug fortran/42118] Slow forall

2012-03-01 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42118 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug fortran/42118] Slow forall

2012-02-29 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42118 xunxun changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xunxun1982 at gmail dot com --- Comment #3 from

[Bug fortran/42118] Slow forall

2009-11-20 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-20 14:20 --- (In reply to comment #0) > I think that ‘forall’ statement must be at least as fast as equivalent > ‘do-…-end do’ construction. The Fortran standardization committee thought likewise, however, as it turned out in pra

[Bug fortran/42118] Slow forall

2009-11-20 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-20 14:03 --- Confirmed. GFortran seems to split the loops differently and uses a larger temporary for the forall case. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --