https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41936
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41936
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|pault at gcc dot gnu.org |dominiq at lps dot
ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41936
--- Comment #8 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dominiq
Date: Mon Jul 7 12:32:37 2014
New Revision: 212329
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212329&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-07-07 Dominique d'Humieres
Mikael Morin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41936
--- Comment #7 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dominiq
Date: Tue Jun 10 11:42:38 2014
New Revision: 211405
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211405&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-06-10 Dominique d'Humieres
Mikael Morin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41936
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Is the following patch OK?
--- ../_clean/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c2014-04-30 21:41:33.0 +0200
+++ gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c2014-05-04 00:42:50.0 +0200
@@ -6504,6 +6504,20 @@ gfc_c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41936
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Calling gfc_deallocate_alloc_comp for BT_CLASS looks wrong. ...
I have only added " && expr->rank" to the three year old Mikael's patch.
> You have to call the finalization wrapper - to ensure that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41936
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #3)
> + if ((expr->ts.type == BT_DERIVED || expr->ts.type == BT_CLASS)
> + && expr->ts.u.derived->attr.alloc_comp && expr->rank
> + && expr->expr_type
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41936
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Fixed if one adds the code below (copied from gfc_conv_array_parameter).
> I'm afraid this could change a memory leak into a double free (see PR 40850).
> Also, not quite right (even if the middle-end
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41936
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
CC|
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-12 13:50 ---
The testcase segfaults on the a = a + b and the c = c + d on Cygwin. On FC8
i386, valgrind does not show any problem with either and the testprogramme runs
to completion!
However, moving a = a + b to subroutine foo a
10 matches
Mail list logo
