--- Comment #13 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-07 08:12 ---
Hopefully, all issues are now fixed. Thus:
Mark as FIXED.
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #12 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-07 08:10 ---
Subject: Bug 41872
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Jan 7 08:09:51 2010
New Revision: 155687
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155687
Log:
2010-01-07 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/41872
--- Comment #11 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-05 07:19 ---
Subject: Bug 41872
Author: burnus
Date: Tue Jan 5 07:19:30 2010
New Revision: 155639
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155639
Log:
2010-01-05 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/41872
--- Comment #10 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-04 07:43 ---
Still TO DO:
- SAVED local variables are (probably) mishandled
- Check whether other things such as allocatable scalar components,
(absent/present) optional dummys etc. work.
- allocatable-scalar returning functio
--- Comment #9 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-04 07:31 ---
Subject: Bug 41872
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Jan 4 07:30:49 2010
New Revision: 155606
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155606
Log:
2009-01-04 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/41872
*
--- Comment #8 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-30 20:50 ---
TODO:
> - SAVED local variables are (probably) mishandled
> - Check whether other things such as allocatable scalar components,
> (absent/present) optional dummys etc. work.
- allocatable-scalar returning functions as
--- Comment #7 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-30 00:20 ---
Created an attachment (id=19421)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19421&action=view)
Patch
- Nullifies local variables
- Fixes double-allocation check in ALLOCATE statement
TODO:
- INTENT(OUT) var
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-15 03:02
---
I have started looking at this.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41872
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-01 20:46 ---
SAVE problem: Simply adding (!sym->attr.save && (... || ...)) to
gfc_trans_deferred_vars does not work as one then reaches "unreachable()"; one
should check where SAVE is handles for allocatable arrays, which is pres
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-01 17:47 ---
Subject: Bug 41872
Author: burnus
Date: Sun Nov 1 17:46:50 2009
New Revision: 153795
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=153795
Log:
2009-11-01 Tobias Burnus
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-01 16:08 ---
First patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-11/msg1.html
TODO:
* For ALLOCATABLE, OPTIONAL" dummies: If the argument is present but not
allocated, "PRESENT()" returns false. As test case add the lines
deal
11 matches
Mail list logo
