https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41829
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-30 06:51 ---
Fixed on trunk.
Thanks for the help, Salvatore - I hope that it will continue.
Paul and Janus
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-29 19:11 ---
Subject: Bug 41829
Author: pault
Date: Thu Apr 29 19:10:48 2010
New Revision: 158910
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=158910
Log:
2010-04-29 Janus Weil
PR fortran/43896
* symb
--- Comment #5 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-04-18 15:42 ---
Confirmed with trunk, fixed with fortran-dev.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41829
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-03 05:33 ---
Subject: Bug 41829
Author: pault
Date: Thu Dec 3 05:32:58 2009
New Revision: 154935
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=154935
Log:
2009-12-03 Paul Thomas
Janus Weil
PR fo
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-26 14:44 ---
Created an attachment (id=18898)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18898&action=view)
another test case
This example nicely illustrates why we need a vtable. Here is a more
compactified version of th
--- Comment #2 from sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it 2009-10-26 12:39 ---
Created an attachment (id=18897)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18897&action=view)
test case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41829
--- Comment #1 from sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it 2009-10-26 12:38 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Hello,
>
Sorry, hit the keyboard too soon.
With trunk at rev. 153550 the attached code compiles cleanly but does not work:
-
