https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41587
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41587
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41587
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus 2012-05-06
20:30:13 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sun May 6 20:30:05 2012
New Revision: 187214
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187214
Log:
2012-05-06 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/41
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41587
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus 2012-04-23
12:59:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> As of yesterday, the testcase in comment #1 compiles and runs
> successfully. We now just need the error message for the original problem.
Untested patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41587
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41587
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41587
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41587
--- Comment #4 from Mikael Morin 2012-02-02
23:11:01 UTC ---
Author: mikael
Date: Thu Feb 2 23:10:55 2012
New Revision: 183853
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183853
Log:
2012-02-02 Mikael Morin
PR fortran/41587
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-18 12:25 ---
Fixed on trunk.
Thanks for the report!
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-17 18:09 ---
Subject: Bug 41587
Author: pault
Date: Sat Oct 17 18:09:25 2009
New Revision: 152955
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=152955
Log:
2009-10-17 Janus Weil
Paul Thomas
PR fo
--- Comment #1 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-10-14 08:42 ---
I don't get an ICE with the coed in comment#0. However I get one with the
following (valid?) changes:
type t0
integer :: j = 42
end type t0
type t
integer :: i
class(t0), allocatable :: foo(:)
end type t
type(t
11 matches
Mail list logo
