[Bug fortran/41581] [OOP] Allocation of a CLASS with SOURCE= does not work

2016-11-16 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41581 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0

[Bug fortran/41581] [OOP] Allocation of a CLASS with SOURCE= does not work

2009-10-13 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-13 16:14 --- Fixed with r152715. Closing. -- janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/41581] [OOP] Allocation of a CLASS with SOURCE= does not work

2009-10-13 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-13 16:12 --- Subject: Bug 41581 Author: janus Date: Tue Oct 13 16:12:24 2009 New Revision: 152715 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=152715 Log: 2009-10-13 Janus Weil PR fortran/41581 * decl

[Bug fortran/41581] [OOP] Allocation of a CLASS with SOURCE= does not work

2009-10-11 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-11 19:07 --- Mine. The plan: Add a '$size' field to the class container, which will be used at runtime to determine the size of the memory block to be allocated. -- janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Re

[Bug fortran/41581] [OOP] Allocation of a CLASS with SOURCE= does not work

2009-10-09 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-09 20:46 --- To prevent wrong-code, SOURCE= is now rejected (cf. PR 41582). For the run-time version: One might also need to check whether SOURCE is allocated - at least with some checking option. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi

[Bug fortran/41581] [OOP] Allocation of a CLASS with SOURCE= does not work

2009-10-05 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-05 12:53 --- See also PR 41582. -- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC