--- Comment #7 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-09 07:30 ---
Fixed (cleared the documentation), but of course the missing support for
CHARACTER arguments is still not fixed.
--
domob at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-09 07:28 ---
Subject: Bug 41507
Author: domob
Date: Tue Feb 9 07:27:47 2010
New Revision: 156618
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156618
Log:
2010-02-09 Daniel Kraft
PR fortran/41507
* in
--- Comment #5 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-01 16:30 ---
Yes, in theory... But now I have holidays (since in some sense this evening)
I'll get on hopefully soon so it will be well in 4.5.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41507
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-01 15:41 ---
PING - Are you still working on this for 4.5?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41507
--- Comment #3 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-07 15:58 ---
Thanks for reminding me, Tobias! Actually, yes, I still plan to fix this. I
probably don't have time and motivation right now to work on a "general plan"
to improve documentation issues like that, but at least on the
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-07 14:44 ---
*PING* Are you still working on this?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41507
--- Comment #1 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-07 14:10 ---
I'll try to find some better formulation for the manual.
--
domob at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
