[Bug fortran/41459] Error not printed with -Werror and -fmax-errors=1

2009-10-01 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-01 17:25 --- A backport to 4.4 revealed a problem within the dejagnu test framework. gfortran.dg/empty_label.f would fail for no apparent/reported reason. So, no backport from me. -- kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

[Bug fortran/41459] Error not printed with -Werror and -fmax-errors=1

2009-09-24 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-24 21:53 --- Subject: Bug 41459 Author: kargl Date: Thu Sep 24 21:53:36 2009 New Revision: 152147 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=152147 Log: 2009-09-24 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/41459 *

[Bug fortran/41459] Error not printed with -Werror and -fmax-errors=1

2009-09-24 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-24 18:35 --- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-09/msg01739.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41459

[Bug fortran/41459] Error not printed with -Werror and -fmax-errors=1

2009-09-24 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-24 16:49 --- I have a patch. -- kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unas

[Bug fortran/41459] Error not printed with -Werror and -fmax-errors=1

2009-09-24 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-24 14:19 --- This is probably related to a difference between gfc_warning and gfc_warning_now. If you look in parse.c, you'll see free-form and fixed-form code behave differently. For fixed-form, no warning is issued. This patch