http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41359
--- Comment #12 from Edouard.Canot at irisa dot fr 2011-02-22 10:36:41 UTC ---
On Tuesday 22 February 2011 11:26:53 you wrote:
(quoting "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" )
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41359
>
> Tobias Burnus changed:
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41359
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41359
--- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus 2011-02-22
10:23:17 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Tue Feb 22 10:23:14 2011
New Revision: 170394
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170394
Log:
2011-02-22 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41359
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus 2011-02-21
21:47:59 UTC ---
I think the current gcov output is OK:
1:1:program main
-:2: implicit none
-:3: integer :: a = 7
1:4: if( a == 0 ) then
#:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41359
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
AssignedTo|tkoenig at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41359
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Assign
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41359
--- Comment #6 from mikael.morin at sfr dot fr 2010-10-13 19:05:15 UTC ---
> this still fails with a recent trunk.
> Mikael, do you plan to commit your patch?
Thanks for the remainder.
I'm currently on something else, but I plan to do it during st
> this still fails with a recent trunk.
> Mikael, do you plan to commit your patch?
Thanks for the remainder.
I'm currently on something else, but I plan to do it during stage 3.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41359
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2010-07-28 20:01:09 |2010-10-13 20:01:09
--
mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mikael at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #4 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2010-04-11 18:02 ---
looks like we have a patch...
--
jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Key
--- Comment #3 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-10 21:27 ---
With this :
diff --git a/trans-expr.c b/trans-expr.c
index 7e95ce1..a6f8616 100644
--- a/trans-expr.c
+++ b/trans-expr.c
@@ -1382,6 +1382,8 @@ gfc_conv_expr_op (gfc_se * se, gfc_expr * expr)
else
se->expr = fo
--- Comment #2 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2010-04-10 19:04 ---
still present in 4.6. The issue seems to be missing location info for the
nested if [if (a>0) ], the missing info in the original dump appears as a
incorrect line:7 in the gimple. It is specific to the 'else if' form, on
13 matches
Mail list logo
