--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-25 02:28 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> This turns out to be the exact bug that Diego reported in his recent email. He
> sent me the code off list. g77 compiles it fine. gfortran does this:
>
> Obviously legacy code issue. I wo
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-25 02:10
---
This turns out to be the exact bug that Diego reported in his recent email. He
sent me the code off list. g77 compiles it fine. gfortran does this:
Obviously legacy code issue. I wonder how many other cases we
--- Comment #3 from bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-25 02:03 ---
lets close with no action taken.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 36234 ***
--
bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-25 00:40 ---
OK. I found it. This is probably a duplicate of
PR 36234
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41160
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-25 00:36 ---
There isn't a problem with having more than 2 complex function
in a file. The problem is that your complex functions are
using a nonstandard extension.
REMOVE:kargl[242] cat > k.f90
COMPLEX FUNCTION F0_HDEC*16(
