[Bug fortran/40996] [F03] ALLOCATABLE scalars

2009-10-02 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-02 22:24 --- (In reply to comment #9) > Can this be closed as FIXED? I think so. -- janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug fortran/40996] [F03] ALLOCATABLE scalars

2009-10-02 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-02 19:33 --- Can this be closed as FIXED? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40996

[Bug fortran/40996] [F03] ALLOCATABLE scalars

2009-09-30 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 19:56 --- Subject: Bug 40996 Author: burnus Date: Wed Sep 30 19:55:45 2009 New Revision: 152345 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=152345 Log: fortran/ 2009-09-30 Janus Weil * check.c (gfc_check

[Bug fortran/40996] [F03] ALLOCATABLE scalars

2009-09-22 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-22 11:40 --- Subject: Bug 40996 Author: janus Date: Tue Sep 22 11:40:30 2009 New Revision: 151975 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151975 Log: 2009-09-22 Janus Weil PR fortran/40996 * decl

[Bug fortran/40996] [F03] ALLOCATABLE scalars

2009-08-31 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-31 10:36 --- r151240 implements basic allocatable scalars. Allocatable scalar components are still missing. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40996

[Bug fortran/40996] [F03] ALLOCATABLE scalars

2009-08-31 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-31 10:22 --- Subject: Bug 40996 Author: janus Date: Mon Aug 31 10:22:32 2009 New Revision: 151240 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151240 Log: 2009-08-31 Janus Weil PR fortran/40996 * chec

[Bug fortran/40996] [F03] ALLOCATABLE scalars

2009-08-07 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-07 12:11 --- (In reply to comment #3) > > and one should do some thinking/testing whether other items are missing. > > One things which is missing is the ALLOCATED intrinsic. Working on it ... Also: allocatable scalar components

[Bug fortran/40996] [F03] ALLOCATABLE scalars

2009-08-07 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-07 11:54 --- (In reply to comment #2) > and one should do some thinking/testing whether other items are missing. One things which is missing is the ALLOCATED intrinsic. Working on it ... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[Bug fortran/40996] [F03] ALLOCATABLE scalars

2009-08-07 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-07 11:48 --- Of cause, you need to add a -std=f95 check - and one should do some thinking/testing whether other items are missing. There are some other related issues, which should be handled separately: - Allocate on assignment

[Bug fortran/40996] [F03] ALLOCATABLE scalars

2009-08-07 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-07 11:22 --- The following is enough to make the test case work: Index: gcc/fortran/resolve.c === --- gcc/fortran/resolve.c (revision 150529) +++ gcc/fortran/re