http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40881
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40881
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus 2012-08-14
10:26:16 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Tue Aug 14 10:26:11 2012
New Revision: 190379
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190379
Log:
2012-08-14 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/40
--- Comment #7 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-07 19:46 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> * shared DO termination
Ahh, I'd like to see that one!
(In reply to comment #6)
That's your PR40165 ;)
--
dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #6 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-03 07:04 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> The warnings about deleted features can be turned off via -std=legacy, and are
> turned into errors by -std=f95 and above.
I think I would like to see a way to disable them with -std=gnu. S
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-02 11:13 ---
r150349 adds warnings for:
* alternate return
* computed goto
* statement functions
* old-style character lengths
Before we already had:
* arithmetic if
* assumed-length character functions
Which leaves the follo
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-02 10:59 ---
Subject: Bug 40881
Author: janus
Date: Sun Aug 2 10:58:44 2009
New Revision: 150349
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=150349
Log:
2009-08-02 Janus Weil
PR fortran/40881
* decl
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-30 08:20 ---
In principle warnings for obsolescent features are already there (cf.
GFC_STD_F95_OBS). They are issued with -std=f95 or above, which does work e.g.
for arithmetic if. However, there is no warning for alternate return
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-29 11:41 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> In a similar vain: One could introduct an option to disable warning for the
> deleted features
Good point. In particular these are:
(1) Real and double precision DO variables.
(2) Branchi
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-28 08:33 ---
In a similar vain: One could introduct an option to disable warning for the
deleted features (such as using real-valued loops) - currently, those warnings
alre always printed, hiding other warnings in all the output.
10 matches
Mail list logo
